Official journal of the Slovak Society of Cardiology,
Slovak Society of Hypertension and Slovak Association for Cardiac Arrhythmias

Cardiology Letters 2014, 23(4):259-266

Long-term follow-up of aortic stenosis after balloon valvuloplasty in childhood - single center results

Goldschmidtová E, Kaldarárová M, Nosáľ M, Mašura M
NÚSCH a.s. - Detské kardiocentrum v Bratislave, Slovenská republika

Aortic stenosis (AS) represents 3-7.8% of all congenital heart defects and most frequently is located on the valvar level. In severe gradient (>80 mm Hg) symptoms, or in the newborn in the event of left ventricular failure, intervention is indicated. Balloon valvuloplasty and surgical valvuloplasty are palliative procedures; further possibilities are valvar replacements - either with pulmonary autograft (Ross procedure), homograft or mechanical valve replacement. Aim of the study was a retrospective analysis of long-term results with balloon valvuloplasty, analysis of residual findings and the need of further interventions. Patients: Analyzed were 60 patients (66.6% males and 33.3% females), who underwent balloon valvuloplasty at our institution between 1987-2007, with long-term follow-up 12.3 years (median).

Results: Good or partial immediate effect was achieved in 95% of patients, with statistically significant decrease of AS gradient [median 80→36.5 mmHg (p<0,0001)], with nonsignificant increase during follow-up. After procedure though the number of patients with significant aortic regurgitation (AR) substantially increased - to 30% early and to 55% of patients in long-term follow-up. Reinterventions were needed in 31 (51.6%) patients, who underwent 40 reinterventions, out of which 39 were on aortic valve (in 4 patients revalvuloplasty, in 13 Ross procedure, in 16 surgical valvuloplasty, in 5 mechanical valve implantation and in 1 patient aortic valve replacement with homograft). Reinterventions were performed 9.5 years (median) after balloon valvuloplasty, dominantly due to newly developed severe AR (in 43.6%), due to combined aortic affection (in 35.9%), or due to repeated progression of AS (in 20.5% patients).

Conclusions: The only management possibility for severe valvar AS is intervention. Due to specificity of pediatric age there is no consensus regarding the most optimal type of solution. The disadvantage of most interventions is their "temporality", with the need of repeated procedures, not only due to progression of previous AS but also due to new pathologies that have to be taken into account and have to be treated.

Keywords: ; aortic stenosis; balloon valvuloplasty; surgical valvuloplasty; Ross procedure; mechanic aortic valve replacement; long-term follow-up

Published: April 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Goldschmidtová E, Kaldarárová M, Nosáľ M, Mašura M. Long-term follow-up of aortic stenosis after balloon valvuloplasty in childhood - single center results. Cardiology Letters. 2014;23(4):259-266.
Download citation

References

  1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practise Guidelines: Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008;118:e523-e661. Go to original source...
  2. Crespo D, Dahdah N. Congenital aortic stenosis in childhood. In: Santavy P. (Ed). Aortic valve stenosis - current view on diagnostics and treatment. Rijeka: InTech; 2011:1-34. DOI: 10.5772/1760. Go to original source...
  3. Alexiou Ch, Chen Q, Langley SM, et al. Is there still a place for open surgical valvulotomy in the management of aortic stenosis in children? The view from Southampton. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2001;20:239-246. Go to original source...
  4. Alexiou Ch, Langley SM, Dalrymple-Hay MJR, et al. Open commissurotomy for Critical Isolated Aortic Stenosis in Neonates. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:489-493. Go to original source...
  5. Hraska V, Photiadis J, Arenz C. Open valvotomy for aortic valve stenosis in newborn and infants. Multimedia Manual of CardioThoracic Sugery. doi:10.1510/mmcts.2006.002311.
  6. Bacha EA, McElhinney DB, Guleserian KJ, et al. Surgical aortic valvuloplasty in children and adolescents with aortic regurgitation: acute and intermediate effects on aortic valve function and left ventricular dimensions. J Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:552-559. Go to original source...
  7. McMullan DM, Oppido G, Davies B, et al. Surgical strategy for the bicuspid aortic valve: tricuspidization with cusp extension versus pulmonary aotograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:90-98. Go to original source...
  8. Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Fadel B, et al. Is the Ross procedure a suitable chioce for aortic valve replacement in children with rheumatic aortic valve disease? World J Ped Cong Heart Surg 2012;3:8-15. Go to original source...
  9. Carrel T. Aortic valve and/or aortic root replacement using an aortic homograft. Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2009. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2009.003905. Go to original source...
  10. Karamlou T, Jang K, Williams WG, et al. Outcomes and associated risk factors for aortic valve replacement in 160 children: a competing risk analysis. Circulation 2005;112:3462-3469. Go to original source...
  11. Balmer C, Beghetti M, Friedli B, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in pediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common. Heart 2004;90:77-81. Go to original source...
  12. Maskatia SA, Ing FF, Justino H, et al. Twenty-five year experience with balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1024-1028. Go to original source...
  13. Fratz S, Gilden HP, Balling G, et al. Aortic Valvuloplasty in Pediatric Patients Substantially Postpones the Need for Aortic Valve Surgery: A Single-Center Experience of 188 Patients After up to 17.5 Years of Follow-Up. Circulation 2008;117:1201-1206. Go to original source...
  14. Ewert P, Bertram H, Breuer J, et al. Ballon valvuloplasty in the treatment of congenital aortic valve stenosis - A retrospective multicenter survey of more than 1000 patients. Int J Cardiol;2011;149:182-185. Go to original source...
  15. Brown WD, Dipilato AE, Chong EC, et al. Aortic valve reinterventions after ballon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. JACC 2010;56:1740-1749. Go to original source...
  16. Reich O, Tax P, Marek J, et al. Long term results of percutaneous ballon valvoplasty of congenital aortic stenosis: independent predictors of outcome. Heart 2004;90:70-76. Go to original source...
  17. McElhinney DB, Blackstone EH, Williams GW, et al. Left heart growth, function, and reintervention after ballon aortic valvuloplasty for neonatal aortic stenosis. Circulation 2005;111:451-458. Go to original source...
  18. Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Fadel B, et al. The Ross procedure in children: preoperative haemodynamic manifestation has significant effect on late autograft re-operation. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2010;38:547-555. Go to original source...
  19. Alsoufi B, Fadel B, Bulbul Z, et al. Cardiac reoperations following the Ross procedure in children: spectrum of surgery and re­ operation results. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2012;42:25-31. Go to original source...
  20. Elkins RC, Lane MM, McCue C. Ross operation in children: late results. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2001;19:269-277.
  21. Alexiou Ch, Langley SM, Dalrymple-Hay MJR, et al. Open commissurotomy for Critical Isolated Aortic Stenosis in Neonates. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:489-493. Go to original source...
  22. Marek J. Stenóza aorty. In: Marek J. 2. díl, Pediatrická a prenatální echokardiografie. Praha: Triton; 2003:258-276.
  23. Muneteka M, Kado H, Ando Y, et al. Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2008;34:42-47. Go to original source...