Cardiology Letters 2024, 33(3):157-167
Peri-implantation and early post-implantation complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) requiring revision. Unicentric study
- II. klinika kardiológie a angiológie, Slovenská zdravotnícka univerzita a Stredoslovenský ústav srdcových a cievnych chorôb, a. s., Banská Bystrica, Slovenská republika
Introduction: In connection with the growing spectrum of indications for the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), the number of peri-implantation and post-implantation complications is also increasing. Many of the complications are solvable with a conservative procedure, but more and more complications require an invasive procedure depending on the complication. The aim of the work is to evaluate peri-implantation and early post-implantation complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), detected at the latest during the first outpatient check-up at our workplace, and which required revision or other early invasive therapeutic procedure. File and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a file of 3,251 consecutively enrolled patients for the period from 1/1/2020 to 11/9/2023, which amounts to 1,349 days. The following procedures were performed on the patients in the group: primary implantation KS: 1512 (47%), ICD: 886 (27%). Venous access through the subclavian/axillaris vein was the non-dominant approach for primary implantations, with a total of 983 punctures out of 2398 procedures (41%). Reimplantation KS: 521 (16%), ICD: 332 (10%). We defined peri-implantation complications as complications arising in the patient directly during the procedure in the operating theatre. Early post-implantation complications were defined as complications that occurred in the patient after leaving the operating theatre until the first outpatient check-up no later than 21.3±39.5 days; median 2 days. For statistical processing, we used the functions of the Microsoft Excel program.
Results: Occurrence of complications was found in 128 patients (3.9%), there were 131 complications (4%). The average age of the patient at the time of the procedure was 70±11 years. The vast majority of the group was represented by men 79 (62%). Peri-implantation complications occured only once, seen directly during the procedure in the operating theatre, and dissection of the coronary sinus during CRT implantation to the number of 6 (0.18%) Post-implantation complications occured in 3.84% of the total number of patients. Early post-implantation complications were pneumothorax 11 (0.34%), tamponade 2 (0.06%), KS/ICD pocket hematoma 21 (0.65%), electrode dislocation 86 (2.65%) (penetration and perforation/ macro - and microdislocation/stimulation threshold increase), system revision for loose fixation screw in device 2 (0.06%) and CIED infection 3 (0.09%). Complications per surgeon in our cardiac centre amount to 4±1%.
Conclusion: In nalysis of our group, in the total number of 3251 patients, complications showed in 128 patients (3.9%), and there were 131 complications (4%). Early post-implantation complications, namely electrode dislocations and pocket hematomas, were the largest number of complications.
Keywords: peri-implantation complications; early post-implantation complications; cardiac implantable electronic devices; patient; revision
Published: March 1, 2024 Show citation
| ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Kaliská G. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in the Slovak Republic: data from SLOVIMPULS register. Cardiology Lett. 2023;32:192-200.
- Palmisano et al. Impact on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Complications. Results From the POINTED Registry. JACC: Clinical electrophysiology 2020;6:382-392, ISSN 2405-500X/$36.00
Go to original source... - Kirkfeldt RE, Johansen JB, Nohr EA, et al. Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1186-1194.
Go to original source... - Gupta N, Kiley ML, Anthony F, et al. Multi-center, communitybased cardiac implantable electronic devices registry: population, device utilization, and outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002798.
Go to original source... - Shakya S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, el al. In hospital complications after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan. J Cardiol 2017;70:405-410.
Go to original source... - Chauhan A, Grace AA, Newell SA, et al. Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:2012-2015.
Go to original source... - Bardy GH, Hofer B, Johnson G, et al. Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation. 1993;87:1152-1168.
Go to original source... - Fuertes B, Toquero J, Arroyo-Espliguero R, Lozano IF. Pacemaker lead displacement: mechanisms and management. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2003;3:231-238.
- Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Amit G. Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Europace 2012;14:8191.
Go to original source... - Mahapatra S, Bybee KA, Bunch TJ, Espinosa RE, Sinak LJ, McGoon MD, et al. Incidence and predictors of cardiac perforation after permanent pacemaker placement. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:907911.
Go to original source... - Bernard ML, Shotwell M, Nietert PJ, Gold MR. Meta-analysis of bleeding complications associated with cardiac rhythm device implantation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:468-474.
Go to original source... - Sticherling C, Marin F, Birnie D, Boriani G, Calkins H, Dan GA, et al. Antithrombotic management in patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) position document endorsed by the ESC Working Group Thrombosis, Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Europace. 2015;17:1197-1214.
Go to original source... - Notaristefano F, Angeli F, Verdecchia P, et al. Device - Pocket Hematoma After Cardiac Implantable Elektronic Devices. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2020;13:e008372.
Go to original source... - Kotter J, Lolay G, Charnigo R, Leung S, McKibbin C, Sousa M, et al. Predictors, morbidity, and costs associated with pneumothorax during electronic cardiac device implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:985-991.
Go to original source... - Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace 2020;22:515-549.
Go to original source... - Kaliská G, Hurta O. Prevencia, diagnostika a liečba infekcií srdcových implantovateľných elektronických zariadení. Kardiolog. Prax. 2023;21:227-236, ISSN 1336-3433
- Olsen T, Jørgensen OD, Nielsen JC, et al. Incidence of devicerelated infection in 97 750 patients: clinical data from the complete Danish device-cohort (1982-2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1862-1869.
Go to original source...

