Official journal of the Slovak Society of Cardiology,
Slovak Society of Hypertension and Slovak Association for Cardiac Arrhythmias

Cardiology Letters 2021, 30(1):31-36

The use of deformation parameters in assessment of left ventricle subclinical dysfunction

Beňačka O, Gonçalvesová E
Kardiologická klinika Lekárská fakulta UK a Národný ústav srdcových a cievnych chorôb, a. s., Bratislava, Slovenská republika

Normal ejection fraction does not truly mean normal systolic function of the myocardium. The ejection mechanism is a complex motion consisting of many shears and rotation. The deformation in longitudinal direction is the most vulnerable part of this complex move. The initial impairment of longitudinal strain is not truly visible by simple, eyeballing, in the echocardiographic examination. The speckle tracking method is an appropriate method to detect such small impairments. In the last 15 years this method has became standard, the reference values have been set up and finally it has found clinical applications. It seems to be useful in cases in which it is necessary to evaluate if the systolic function is already subclinically damaged: typically in severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis, in cardiooncology or in differential diagnosis of thick wall myocardium. The speckle tracking option will soon be a standard part of the software package of every ultrasound machine so it is good to emphasize some practical aspects of dataset aquisition.

Keywords: strain; longitudinal strain; speckle tracking; subclinical dysfunction

Published: January 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Beňačka O, Gonçalvesová E. The use of deformation parameters in assessment of left ventricle subclinical dysfunction. Cardiology Letters. 2021;30(1):31-36.
Download citation

References

  1. Torrent-Guasp F, Kocica MJ, Corno A, et al. Towards new understanding of the heart structure and function. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2005;27:191-201. Go to original source...
  2. Beňačka O, Horváth V, Hatala R, et al. Exact classification of left ventricular function. Cardiology Lett. 2020;29:229-234. Go to original source...
  3. Voigt J-U, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyanski P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:1-11. Go to original source...
  4. Yingchoncharoen T, Agarwal S, Popovic ZB, et al. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:185-191. Go to original source...
  5. Alcidi GM, Esposito R, Evola V, et al. Normal reference values of multilayer longitudinal strain according to age decades in a healthy population: A single-centre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:1390-1396. Go to original source...
  6. Farsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Űrlü S, et al. Head-to-head comparison of global longitudinal strain measurements among nine different vendors: the EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1171-1181. e2. Go to original source...
  7. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chattarjee K, et al. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:e1-e142. Go to original source...
  8. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739-2791. Go to original source...
  9. Lund O, Flø C, Jensen FT, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis: Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1977-1987. Go to original source...
  10. Salaun E, Casalta AC, Donal E, et al. Apical four-chamber longitudinal left ventricular strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: analysis related with flow/gradient pattern and association with outcome. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:868-878. Go to original source...
  11. Ng ACT, Prihadi EA, Antoni MC, et al. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is predictive of all-cause mortality independent of aortic stenosis severity and ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;1:859-867. Go to original source...
  12. Kearney LG, Lu K, Ord M, et al. Global longitudinal strain is a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:827-833. Go to original source...
  13. Lafitte S, Perlant M, Reant P, et al. Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:414-419. Go to original source...
  14. Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, t al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart 2010;96:1364-1371. Go to original source...
  15. Carstensen HG, Larsen LH, Hassager C, et al. Basal longitudinal strain predicts future aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:283-292. Go to original source...
  16. Sato K, Seo Y, Ishizu T, et al. Prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation Journal 2014:CJ-14-0726. Go to original source...
  17. Dulgheru R, Pibarot P, Sengupta PP, et al. Multimodality imaging strategies for the assessment of aortic stenosis: viewpoint of the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) Group. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2016;9:e004352. Go to original source...
  18. Armstrong GT, Joshi VM, Ness KK, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic detection of treatment-related cardiac dysfunction in adult survivors of child hood cancer: results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2511-2522. Go to original source...
  19. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, et al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1063-1093. Go to original source...
  20. Nolan MT, Plana JC, Thavendiranathan P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of strain-targeted cardioprotection for prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Int J Cardiol. 2016;212:336-345. Go to original source...
  21. Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim KD, et al. Use of myocardial strain imaging by echocardiography for the early detection of cardiotoxicity in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63(25 Part A):27512768. Go to original source...
  22. Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Muñoz DR, et al. 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2768-2801. Go to original source...
  23. Yeh ET, Vejpongsa P. Subclinical cardiotoxicity associated with cancer therapy: early detection and future directions. 2015, American College of Cardiology Foundation Washington, DC. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2523-2525. Go to original source...
  24. Buss SJ, Emami M, Mereles D, et al. Longitudinal left ventricular function for prediction of survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis: incremental value compared with clinical and biochemical markers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1067-1076. Go to original source...
  25. Sun P, Stewart WJ, Yang XS, et al. Differentiation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis from other causes of ventricular wall thickening by two-dimensional strain imaging echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:411-415. Go to original source...
  26. Falk RH. Pondering the prognosis and pathology of cardiac amyloidosis: answers breed questions. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;9:131-149. Go to original source...
  27. Pagourelias ED, Duchenne J, Mirea O, et al. The relation of ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain in amyloidosis: implications for differential diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2016;9:1358-1359. Go to original source...
  28. Phelan D, Collier P, Thavendiranathan P, et al. Relative apical sparing of longitudinal strain using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography is both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 2012;98:1442-1448. Go to original source...
  29. Senapati A, Sperry BW, Grodin JL, et al. Prognostic implication of relative regional strain ratio in cardiac amyloidosis. Heart 2016;102:748-754. Go to original source...
  30. Kim EK, Lee SCh, Hwang JW, et al. Differences in apical and nonapical types of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a prospective analysis of clinical, echocardiographic, and cardiac magnetic resonance findings and outcome from 350 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:678-686. Go to original source...
  31. Ho CY, Carlsen Ch, Køber L, et al. Echocardiographic strain imaging to assess early and late consequences of sarcomere mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2:314-321. Go to original source...
  32. Kim EK, Lee SCh, Hwang JW, et al. Differences in apical and nonapical types of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a prospective analysis of clinical, echocardiographic, and cardiac magnetic resonance findings and outcome from 350 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:678-686. Go to original source...
  33. Afonso L, Kondur A, Abraham TP, et al. Two-dimensional strain profiles in patients with physiological and pathological hypertrophy and preserved left ventricular systolic function: a comparative analyses. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001390. Go to original source...
  34. D'Andrea A, Radmilovic J, Ballo P, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy or storage disease? The incremental value of speckle tracking strain bull's-eye. Echocardiography 2017;34:746-759. Go to original source...
  35. Haland TF, Almaas VM, Hasselberg NE, et al. Strain echocardiography is related to fibrosis and ventricular arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:613-621. Go to original source...
  36. Reant P, Reynaud A, Pillois XP, et al. Comparison of resting and exercise echocardiographic parameters as indicators of outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2015;28:194-203. Go to original source...
  37. Reant P, Mirabel M, Lloyd G, et al. Global longitudinal strain is associated with heart failure outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 2016;102:741-747. Go to original source...
  38. Saito M, Okayma H, Yoshii T, et al. Clinical significance of global two-dimensional strain as a surrogate parameter of myocardial fibrosis and cardiac events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:617-623. Go to original source...
  39. Hartlage GR, Kim JH, Strickland PT, et al. The prognostic value of standardized reference values for speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2015;31557-565. Go to original source...
  40. Mada RO, Lysyanski P, Daraban AM, et al. How to define end-diastole and end-systole?: impact of timing on strain measurements. JACC: Cardiovacular Imaging 2015;8:158-160. Go to original source...
  41. Rösner A, Barbosa D, Aarsaether E, et al. The influence of frame rate on two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain measurements: a study on silico-simulated models and images recorded in patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:1137-1147. Go to original source...
  42. Collier P, Phelan D, Klein A. A test in context: myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1043-1056. Go to original source...