Official journal of the Slovak Society of Cardiology,
Slovak Society of Hypertension and Slovak Association for Cardiac Arrhythmias

Cardiology Letters 2014, 23(2):126-132

Long-term outcome and complications after catheter closure of persistent arterial duct

Tittel P1, Kaldarárová M1, Brucknerová I2, Mašura M3
1 NÚSCH a.s. - Detské kardiocentrum, Bratislava
2 I. Detská klinika LF UK a DFNsP, Bratislava
3 Klinika detskej kardiológie LF UK, NÚSCH a.s. - Detské kardiocentrum, Bratislava, Slovenská republika

Introduction: Catheter closure is the world-wide method of choice in the management of persis­ tent arterial duct beyond newborn age. According to the size and duct morphology the type of device is chosen during the procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term outcome and complications according to different devices used.

Patients and methods: Presented are 456 patients (67.3% female/32.7% male) after catheter closure of persistent arterial duct in NÚSCH - Children´s Cardiac Center between 1996-2012. Patients were grouped as follows: 150 patients with the coil closure (COIL), 178 patients with Amplatzer ductal occluder (ADO) and 128 patients with Amplatzer ductal occluder type II. (ADO II) closure. Long-term follow-up was considered up to 10 years (with median follow-up 4.5 years).

Results: Closure effectiveness was high in all three groups of patients. In long-term follow-up in the COIL group complete closure was found in 94,7% of patients, in ADO and ADO II groups it was 100%. The incidence of complications during the follow-up period was low. There was left pulmonary artery obstruction 3.3% of patients in the COIL group, in the ADO group 5.0% and 3.1% in the ADO II group of patients. Obstruction of the aortic isthmus in the COIL group was present in 0% of patients, in the ADO group 5.1% and in the ADO II group in 4.7% of patients. Overall reinterventions were needed in 5 patients (1.1%): in the COIL group in 4 patients (in 1 patient due to residual leak, in 2 due to left pulmonary artery obstruction, in 1 due to coil embolisation immediately after closure), in the ADO group in 1 patient (due to incorrect occluder position 24 hours after closure) and in the ADO II group no intervention was needed.

Conclusions: Results in the follow-up group prove that catheter closure of persistent arterial duct is a highly effective method with low incidence of complications in short-, as well as long-term, follow-up. This method can therefore successfully replace surgery in most patients beyond the newborn period.

Keywords: persistent arterial duct; catheter closure; coil; Amplatzer septal occluder; Amplatzer septal occluder type II.

Published: February 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tittel P, Kaldarárová M, Brucknerová I, Mašura M. Long-term outcome and complications after catheter closure of persistent arterial duct. Cardiology Letters. 2014;23(2):126-132.
Download citation

References

  1. Krichenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, et al. Angiographic classification of the isolated persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J of Card 1989;63:877-880. Go to original source...
  2. Sheridan BJ, Ward CJ, Anderson BW, Justo RN. Transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus: an intention to treat analysis. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2013;22:428-432. Go to original source...
  3. Ammar RI, Hegazy RA. Percutaneous closure of medium and large PDAs using Amplatzer Duct Occluder (ADO) I and II in infants: Safety and efficacy. J Invasive Cardiol 2012;24(11):579-582.
  4. Chen Z-Y, Wu L-M, Luo Y-K, et al. Comparison of long-term clinical outcome between transcatheter Amplatzer occlusion and surgical closure of isolated patent ductus Arteriosus. Chinese Medical Journal 2009;122(10):1123-1127.
  5. Abma S. Amplatzer device closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA): A case report. The ORION Medical Journal 2007;28:505-507.
  6. Ing FF, Sommer RJ. The snare-assisted technique for transcatheter coil occlusion of moderate to large patent ductus arteriosus: immediate and intermediate results. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1999;33(6):1710-1718. Go to original source...
  7. Masura J, Walsh KP, Thanopoulous B, et al. Catheter closure of moderate- to large-sized patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer Duct Occluder: immediate and short term results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(4):878-882. Go to original source...
  8. Masura J, Tittel P, Gavora P, Podnar T. Long-term outcome of transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure using Amplatzer duct occluders. Am Heart J. 2006;151(3):755.e7-e10. Go to original source...
  9. Parra-Bravo R, Cruz-Ramírez A, Rebolledo-Pineda V, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the Amplatzer Duct Occluder in infants under one year of age. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(08):867-874. Go to original source...
  10. Al-Hamash SM, Wahab HA, Khalid ZH, Nasser IV. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using ADO device: Retrospective study of 149 patients. Heart Views 2012;13:1-6. Go to original source...
  11. Thanopoulos B, Eleftherakis N, Tzannos K, Stefanadis C. Transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer duct occluder: initial clinical applications in children. Am Heart J. 2008;156(5):917.e1-917.e6. Go to original source...
  12. Thanopoulos B, Eleftherakis N, Tzannos K, Stefanadis Ch, Giann­ opoulos A. Further experience with catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the new Amplatzer duct occluder in children. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1005-1009. Go to original source...
  13. Schneider DJ, Moore JW. Patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation. 2006;114:1873-1882. Go to original source...
  14. Dimas VV, Takao Ch, Ing FF, Mattamal R, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus in infants weighing <6 kg. JACC : Cardiovascular Interventions 2010;3(12):1295-1299.
  15. Dean PN, Slack MC. Stent angioplasty to relieve left pulmonary artery obstruction caused by patent ductus arteriosus device occlusion: Bipartisan teamwork by two interventional devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(3):480-484. Go to original source...
  16. Patel HT, Cao QL, Rhodes J, Hijazi ZM. Long-term outcome of transcatheter coil closure of small to large patent ductus arter­ iosus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47(4):457-461. Go to original source...
  17. Doshi AR, Rao PS. Development of aortic coarctation following device closure of patent ductus arteriosus. J invasive cardiol 2013;25(9):464-467.
  18. Daniels CJ, Cassidy SC, Teske DW, et al. Reopening after successful coil occlusion for patent ductus arteriosus. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1998;31(2):444-450. Go to original source...
  19. Gupta K, Rao PS. Severe intravascular hemolysis after transcatheter coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 2005;17(10):15-27.
  20. Vavuranakis M, Tzannos KA, Thanopoulos B, et al. Severe hemolysis complicating transcatheter occlusion of a patent ductus arteriosus: The importance of elimination of residual flow. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology 2007;48(6):373-376.
  21. Jang GY, Son CS, Lee JW, et al. Complications after Transcatheter Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus. J Korean Med Sci 2007;22:484-490. Go to original source...
  22. Marasini M, Rimini A, Zannini L, Pongiglione G. Giant aneurysm following coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2000;50(2):186-189. Go to original source...