Official journal of the Slovak Society of Cardiology,
Slovak Society of Hypertension and Slovak Association for Cardiac Arrhythmias

Cardiology Letters 2016, 25(2):71-78

Radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension - 12-month follow-up

Maďarič J1, Vulev I2, Fľak Ľ1, Postulková Ľ2, Škultétyová D1, Maďaričová T1, Hladíková D1, Tóth M1, Vašková J1, Drangová E2, Mikuláš J2, Mistrík A1, Chňupa P1
1 Klinika kardiológie a angiológie NÚSCH, a.s. a LF SZU
2 Klinika diagnostickej a intervenčnej rádiológie NÚSCH a.s. a LF SZU, Bratislava, Slovenská republika

Aims: To evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency renal sympathetic denerv­ ation (RDN) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (AH) in mid-term follow-up.

Methods: In the group of 21 patients (age 54±10 years, M:F 13:8) with inadequately controlled AH on ≥3 com­ bination of antihypertensive treatment including diuretics (average office blood pressure (BP) 187/112 mmHg with average number of antihypertensive drugs 7±1), we performed RDN intervention in analgosedation via transfemoral percutaneous approach with the use of RDN Symplicity catheter and EnligHTN catheter. During the 12 months follow-up period we analyzed changes in office BP, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), as well as presence of complications. Patients with decrease in office systolic BP ≥10mmHg were defined as responders to RDN.

Results: Global or local complications linked to intervention were not detected. The change in renal filtra­ tion did not occur, and we did not register renal artery stenosis on control CT angiography 3 months after RDN. One patient died 11 months after RDN due to acute myocardial infarction. In 20 observed patients a significant decrease in office BP 12 months after RDN was present (sBP 187±20 vs 162±32mmHg, p=0.002; dBP 112±20 vs 97±20mmHg, p=0.0006), however only a borderline decrease of ABPM values was reached (sTK 169±16 vs 163±30mmHg, p=0.13). Target decrease of office BP 12 months after RDN was achieved in 15/20 patients (75%). The number or dosage of antihypertensive drugs was reduced in 10/20 patients (50%). In the subgroup of 11 patients (55%) the decrease in ΔsBP>20mmHg together with ΔABPM sBP >15mmHg with average drop in office BP -51/-26mmHg and ABPM -23/-9mmHg was achieved ("super-responders"). Responders on RDN were characterized by higher values of office BP before RDN (191±21 vs 175±15mmHg, p=0.04), lower values of ABPM before RDN (149/80 vs 165/97mmHg, p<0.05), and by a higher number of ablation points (12.5±2.7 vs 10.2±1.1, p=0.009), compared to non-responders.

Conclusions: Radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation is a safe method achieving significant decrease in office BP, though only with borderline drop in ABPM, in patients with resistant AH during the one year follow-up period. An increase in number of responders to RDN could be expected after the introduction of a better generation of ablation catheters, and mainly after identification of proper a phenotype of resistant AH for RDN procedure.

Keywords: resistant arterial hypertension; renal sympathetic denervation; radiofrequency ablation interventional procedure

Published: February 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maďarič J, Vulev I, Fľak Ľ, Postulková Ľ, Škultétyová D, Maďaričová T, et al.. Radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension - 12-month follow-up. Cardiology Letters. 2016;25(2):71-78.
Download citation

References

  1. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, White A, Cushman WC, White W, Sica D, Ferdinand K, Giles TD, Falkner B, Carey RM, American Heart Association Professional Education C. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2008;117:e510-e526. Go to original source...
  2. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, Christiaens T, Cifkova R, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Galderisi M, Grobbee DE, Jaarsma T, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Manolis AJ, Nilsson PM, Ruilope LM, Schmieder RE, Sirnes PA, Sleight P, Viigimaa M, Waeber B, Zannad F, Task Force M. ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013;31:1281-1357. Go to original source...
  3. Skultetyova D. Role of sympathetic nervous system in the pathophysiology of resistant hypertension. Cardiology Lett. 2015;24:226-229.
  4. Esler M. Renal denervation for hypertension: observations and predictions of a founder. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1178-1185. Go to original source...
  5. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, Sobotka PA, Sadowski J, Bartus K, Kapelak B, Walton A, Sievert H, Thambar S, Abraham WT, Esler M. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-ofprinciple cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373:1275-1281. Go to original source...
  6. Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, Esler MD, Krum H, Sobotka PA, Schlaich MP, Schmieder RE, Böhm M. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1903-1909.
  7. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O'Neill WW, D'Agostino R, Flack JM, Katzen BT, Leon MB, Liu M, Mauri L, Negoita M, Cohen SA, Oparil S, Rocha-Singh K, Townsend RR, Bakris GL; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Investigators. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1393-1401. Go to original source...
  8. Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Schmieder RE, Cremers B, Rump LC, Vonend O, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure changes after renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Circulation. 2013;128:132-140. Go to original source...
  9. Mahfoud F, Lüscher TF, Andersson B, Baumgartner I, Cifkova R, Dimario C, et al. Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2149-2157. Go to original source...
  10. Esler MD, Böhm M, Sievert H, Rump CL, Schmieder RE, Krum H, Mahfoud F, Schlaich MP. Catheter-based renal denervation for treatment of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: 36 month results from the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1752-1759. Go to original source...
  11. Azizi M, Sapoval M, Gosse P, Monge M, Bobrie G, Delsart P, Midulla M, Mounier-Véhier C, Courand PY, Lantelme P, Denolle T, Dourmap-Collas C, Trillaud H, Pereira H, Plouin PF, Chatellier G; Renal Denervation for Hypertension (DENERHTN) investigators. Optimum and stepped care standardised antihypertensive treatment with or without renal denervation for resistant hypertension (DENERHTN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1957-1965. Go to original source...
  12. Sharp A, Hameed A, Nightingale A, Martin U, Mark P, Mckane W, Cunnington M, Lobo M, Mahadevan K, Richardson T, Gerber R, Clifford P, Burchell A, Doulton T, Dimario C, Thackray S, Redwood S, Davies J, Antonios T, Dasgupta I. 8B.07: Results from the uk renal denervation affiliation - 246 cases from 17 centres. J Hypertens. 2015 Jun;33:Suppl 1:e109. Go to original source...
  13. Mancia G, Mahfoud F, Narkiewicz K, Ruilope LM, Schlaich MP, Schmieder RE, Williams B, Böhm M. 4A.01: Long-term effects of renal artery denervation in real world patients with uncontrolled hypertension from the global symplicity registry. J Hypertens. 2015;33:Suppl 1:e49. Go to original source...
  14. Rosa J, Widimský P, Toušek P, Petrák O, Čurila K, Waldauf P, Bednář F, Zelinka T, Holaj R, Štrauch B, Šomlóová Z, Táborský M, Václavík J, Kociánová E, Branny M, Nykl I, Jiravský O, Widimský J Jr. Randomized comparison of renal denervation versus intensified pharmacotherapy including spironolactone in true-resistant hypertension: six-month results from the Prague-15 study. Hypertension. 2015;65:407-413. Go to original source...
  15. Fadl Elmula FE, Jin Y, Yang WY, Thijs L, Lu YC, Larstorp AC, Persu A, Sapoval M, Rosa J, Widimský P, Jacobs L, Renkin J, Petrák O, Chatellier G, Shimada K, Widimský J, Kario K, Azizi M, Kjeldsen SE, Staessen JA; European Network Coordinating Research On Renal Denervation (ENCOReD) Consortium. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of renal denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension. Blood Press. 2015;24:263-274. Go to original source...
  16. Persu A, Jin Y, Baelen M, Vink E, Verloop WL, Schmidt B, Blicher MK, Severino F, Wuerzner G, Taylor A, Pechère-Bertschi A, Jokhaji F, Fadl Elmula FE, Rosa J, Czarnecka D, Ehret G, Kahan T, Renkin J, Widimsky J Jr, Jacobs L, Spiering W, Burnier M, Mark PB, Menne J, Olsen MH, Blankestijn PJ, Kjeldsen S, Bots ML, Staessen JA; European Network Coordinating research on REnal Denervation Consortium. Eligibility for renal denervation: experience at 11 European expert centers. Hypertension. 2014;63:1319-1325. Go to original source...
  17. Kohara K, Nishida W, Maguchi M, Hiwada K. Autonomic nervous function in non-dipper essential hypertensive subjects. Evaluation by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Hypertension. 1995;26:808-814. Go to original source...
  18. Ghadri JR, Gaehwiler R, Jaguszewski M, Sudano I, Osipova J, Schoenenberger-Berzins R, Erne P, Lüscher TF, Templin C. Impact of local vascular lesions assessed with optical coherence tomography and ablation points on blood pressure reduction after renal denervation. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14102. Go to original source...
  19. Vulev I, Lesný P, Vozár M, Stanová L. Endovaskulárna liečba ochorení obličkovej tepny. Kardiol. prax 2005;3:220-224.
  20. Hladíková D, Vulev I, Klepanec A, Kozlovská T, Balázs T, Líška B, Bažík R, Mistrík A, Škultétyová D, Maďarič J. Prediktory pozitívneho klinického efektu po stentingu renálnej tepny. Cardiol 2010;19:Suppl. 1:17S.