Oficiálny časopis Slovenskej kardiologickej spoločnosti,
Slovenskej hypertenziologickej spoločnosti a Slovenskej asociácie srdcových arytmií

Cardiology Letters 2013, 22(4):308-313

Reevaluation of the electrocardiographic pattern of left bundle branch block for proper patient selection and better survival in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Préda I
Medical Center Hungarian Defense Forces, Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Semmelweis University Budapest, Hungary

According to the present guidelines, in New York Heart Association Class I-IV heart failure, ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and electrocardiographic (ECG) QRS width ≥ 120 ms and left bundle branch block, cardiac resynchronization therapy is indicated. Reevaluation of the MADIT-CRT data and electrophysiologic and pathologic findings of human left bundle branch block gave evidence that "true" left bundle branch block requires a QRS width of ≥ 130 ms (in woman) and ≥ 140 ms (in man). In true, (not continuously widening, but presenting with at least 40 ms abrupt QRS prolongation) left bundle branch block, the initial (septal) QRS forces lose their original left-to-right direction. After the right ventricular depolarization (30-40 ms) an interventricular (slow, muscular) activation occurs that takes ≥ 40 ms, whereas the final depolarization of the lateral wall of the left ventricle takes also ≥ 50 ms, that is to say the total QRS length ≥ 130 ms, or more. After the 40th ms from the beginning of depolarization, notched/ slurred R waves are characteristic, visible in a minimum two of the leads of the I, aVL, V1, V2, V5 and V6, and a ≥ 40 ms increase of QRS complex develops, if compared to the pre-LBBB QRS time. In contrast, the slow, continuously widened "LBBB-like" QRS pattern mostly belongs to left ventricular hypertrophy, or it is an ECG sign of a metabolic or infiltrative disease.

Kľúčové slová: heart failure; cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); MADIT-CRT study; morphology of

Uverejnené: April 1, 2013  Zobraziť citáciu

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Préda I. Reevaluation of the electrocardiographic pattern of left bundle branch block for proper patient selection and better survival in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Cardiology Letters. 2013;22(4):308-313.
Stiahnuť citáciu

Referencie

  1. McMurray JV, Adamopulos S, Anker SD, et al. European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1787-1847.
  2. Importance of defining left bundle branch block. (Editorial). J. Electrophysiol. 2012;45:505-507.
  3. Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:927-934. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  4. Gettes LS, Kligfield P. Should electrocardiogram criteria for the diagnosis of left bundle branch block be revised? J Electrocardiol 2012;45:500-504. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  5. Durrer D Dam RTH Van, Freud GE, Janse JM, Meijler FI, Arzbaecher RC. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 1970:41:899-912. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  6. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2140-2150. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  7. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1539-1549. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  8. Egoavil CA, Ho RT, Greenspon JA, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with right bundle branch block: analysis of pooled data from the MIRACLE and Contak CD trials. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:611-615. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  9. Bilchik KC, Kamath S, DiMarco JP, et al. Bundle-branch morphology and other predictors of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in Medicare patients. Circulation 2010;122:2022-2030. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  10. Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankievicz I, et al. CRT-D effectiveness by QRS duration and morphology in MADIT-CRT patients. Heart Rhythm 2010;7:S24-S25.
  11. Barker PS, Macleod AG, Alexander JA. The excitatory process observed in the exposed human heart. Am Heart J 1930;5:720-742. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  12. Wilson FN. Concerning the form of the QRS deflections of the electrocardiogram in bundle branch block. J Mount Sinai Hosp New York 1941;8:1110-1114.
  13. Grant RP, Dodge HT. Mechanisms of QRS complex prolongation in man: left ventricular conduction disturbances. Am J Med 1956;20:834-852. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  14. Selvester RHS, Solomon JC. Computer simulation of ventricular depolarization. QRS duration and quantification of wall thickness. In: Willems JL, Van Bemmel JH, Zywietz S eds. Computer ECG Analysis. North Holland: Towards standardization Amsterdam; 1968:221-272.
  15. Panadilam BJ, Morris KE, Olson JA, et al. The surface electrocardiogram predicts risk of heart block during right heart catheterization in patients with preexisting left bundle branch block: implication for the definition of complete left bundle branch block. J Cardiovasular Electrophysiol 2010;21:781-769. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  16. Vassalo JA, Cassidy DM, Marchlinski FE, et al. Endocardial activation of left bundle branch block. Circulation 1984;69:914923. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  17. Wyndham CRC, Smith T, Meeran MK et al: Epicardial activation in patients with left bundle branch block. Circulation 1980;61:696701. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  18. Van Dam RTH. Ventricular activation in human and canine bundle branch block. In: Vellens HJJ, Lie KI, Janse MJ (eds). The conduction system of the heart. Leiden: Stenfert and Kroese BV; 1976:377-392.
  19. Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F, et al. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. Circulation 2004;109:1133-1139. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  20. Fantoni C, Kawabata M, Massaro R, et al. Right and left ventricular activation sequence in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a detailed analysis using three-dimensional and non-fluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping system. J Cardiovas Electrophysiol 2005;16:112-119. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  21. Wagner GS. Marriot´s practical electrocardiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:468.
  22. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances. J am Coll Cardiol 2009;53565-629. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  23. Selvester RH, Wagner GS, Ideker RE. Myocardial infarction. In: Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDW (eds). Comprehensive electrocardiology: theory and practice in health and disease. New York: Pergamon Press; 1989:565-629.
  24. Macfarlane P, Lawrie TDV. Appendix 1: normal limits. In: Macfarlane P, Lawrie TDV (eds). Comprehensive electrocardiology: theory and practice in health and disease. New York: Pergamon Press; 1989:1441.
  25. Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankiewicz I. et al. Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillation Implantation Trial - Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation; 2011:1061-1072. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  26. Mascioli G, Padeletti L, Sassone B, et al. Electrocardiographic criteria of true left bundle branch block: a simple sign to predict better clinical and instrumental response to CRT. PACE 2012;35:927-934. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  27. Hakacova N, Steding K, Engblom H, et al. Aspects of left ventricular morphology outperform mass for prediction of QRS duration. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15:124-129. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...